Leo Laporte Receives No Sympathy From Twitter

His dick is this long.
His dick is this long.

It wasn’t long ago that Leo Laporte suggested to Virginia Heffernan that “it’s all fabricated” and “it’s one guy” when referring to #TeamOneAss and #DvorakTrollArmy. And let us not forget that “it’s all one ass” photoshopping his dick into live video that was later poorly edited out.

He would like to pretend — he doesn’t believe it himself, right? — that only one person dislikes him and what he’s let Lisa Kentzell do to his once-acceptable tech netpodcasting network.

However, look at this sampling of his (previous?) audience’s reaction to him complaining about Twitter… on Twitter.

Reactions to Leo Laporte on Twitter

36 thoughts on “Leo Laporte Receives No Sympathy From Twitter”

  1. Leo the Sociopathic Liar doesn’t have an off button. He must be getting some kind of dopamine rush every time he does shit like this. In order to get the same rush he’s got to up the ante constantly. Soon he’ll need to inflate his penis with a pump during shows (concealed behind a desk) and lie about it. He loves lying, sexually harassing, exposing himself live on air and using projection to deflect the fact that he himself is the ultimate TROLL. Fuck YOU Leo…how do you like that?

      » Quote comment

  2. I hate Twitter which reduces communications to 140 character “grunts”, I only have an account because there are companies that won’t provide responsive customer service via any other medium.

    My take on Twitter is that they actually don’t want to moderate users. My moderation solution would be to have two basic classes of Twitter user – identity verified, and identity non-verified. Identity verified would use a tiny/nominal credit/debit card transaction for basic verification(not foolproof but reasonable).

    Any Twitter account holder could choose to allow replies that were – identity verified users only. That should cut down on much of the worst of trolling and allow the ability to more accurately identify and block troublemakers.

    As I said, seems to me Twitter really don’t to make any real effort to moderate their users effectively.

      » Quote comment

  3. 2 great articles in a row.

    Leo reminds me of Trump, the whole world tells him to stop the live sexual harassment ( Trump anti-mexicanism) and using his own device on air (Trump – talking off the cuff) because it’s killing his business (Trump-campaign) and he responds, “I listen to no one.” He takes zero responsibly for his actions and blames trolls (Trump-media.)

    Leo thinks it’s ok to insult famous people, former colleagues, and anyone else on his live stream with a claimed audience of a few thousand but if someone tells him Mcbreak Weekly sucks on Twitter (where ten people check Leo’s mentions) he throws a repeated fits and leaves Twitter claiming it’s a cesspool. All the SJW’s have issues. Normal celebrities don’t care. Leo cares because about 60% of people who engage with him hate him.

    I thought the Twitter responses above were edited, I checked and they’re real. I get called names whenever I take sides in politics, sports or religion on Twitter but I move on.

      » Quote comment

  4. After seeing how quickly Jack Dorsey reacted and eradicated from twitter Milo Yiannopolous Leo & Lisa Laporte think that this is the best way to get rid of people that are critical of them.

    In fact the Gold digger made a point in her tweet made before they made the account protected where the tweet was directed at Jack Dorsey. Her claim that it was because of getting trolled that they were no longer going to use Twitter.

    It was purely in an attempt to get Jack Dorsey to reach out to her so she could supply a list of the horrible people that are harassing her and her ‘beetus suffer beta-male spouse and have them permanently eradicated from twitter.

    Rather than moving on and ignoring those that are critical they want to silence critics yet Leo Laporte sits in front of a camera and claims he is pro-freedom of speech while looking at every possible way to silence dissenters.

    He is a hypocrite. He’s just like the SJW snowflakes on social media that scream about their first amendment rights but then when it comes to the first amendment right to those that have opposing views to theirs they go out of their way to have them silenced and in some cases go out of their way to have them lose their jobs.

    In fact with the changes that are rolling out Leo will be back on in no time because anything that is critical of him from non-verified users will be blurred out like he lives in a world where people have been silenced if they aren’t verified but Twitter chooses who will attain verification and who will not.

    Either way, Twitter will continue to circle the drain because they choose to pander to those sensistive little souls that are so delicate they may as well be snowflakes.

      » Quote comment

    1. Ferdinand Legrand said:
      After seeing how quickly Jack Dorsey reacted and eradicated from twitter Milo Yiannopolous Leo & Lisa Laporte think that this is the best way to get rid of people that are critical of them.

      In fact the Gold digger made a point in her tweet made before they made the account protected where the tweet was directed at Jack Dorsey.Her claim that it was because of getting trolled that they were no longer going to use Twitter.

      It was purely in an attempt to get Jack Dorsey to reach out to her so she could supply a list of the horrible people that are harassing her and her ‘beetus suffer beta-male spouse and have them permanently eradicated from twitter.

      Rather than moving on and ignoring those that are critical they want to silence critics yet Leo Laporte sits in front of a camera and claims he is pro-freedom of speech while looking at every possible way to silence dissenters.

      He is a hypocrite.He’s just like the SJW snowflakes on social media that scream about their first amendment rights but then when it comes to the first amendment right to those that have opposing views to theirs they go out of their way to have them silenced and in some cases go out of their way to have them lose their jobs.

      In fact with the changes that are rolling out Leo will be back on in no time because anything that is critical of him from non-verified users will be blurred out like he lives in a world where people have been silenced if they aren’t verified but Twitter chooses who will attain verification and who will not.

      Either way, Twitter will continue to circle the drain because they choose to pander to those sensistive little souls that are so delicate they may as well be snowflakes.

      FUCK YOU LAPORKE!

      how do you like that?

        » Quote comment

  5. So if Fat Fuck Laporte and ManTranny
    aka CeHo quit Twitter that means we can grab use @Leolaporte and @LisaLaHore as our own handle ???

    After all with that fat fucks hissy fit the 100th in the past few years I’m pretty sure this time he really did deleted his account & ManTranny aka CeSlut did as well
    Right???
    Right???
    Or is he just lying again???
    and again???
    for ratings??
    after all any media exposure good or bad is what these two scumbags thrive off!!!!

    Fuck you LaFaggot

      » Quote comment

  6. OK, been following this for quite awhile and here are some comments:

    TwIT is a private company so they can destroy it or improve it as they wish. If they want to ignore people it’s their choice.

    If they make bad choices the company and their revenue will suffer … But it’s their company!

    If people don’t like the company then DON’T watch the shows or follow what they do. Seems like many here complain but still follow TWiT … which is funny.

    If people want to work there, then that’s their choice too. If they don’t like it there they can leave.

    People here have been insulting to employees yet no one here complains about that. You might dislike the owners but why take it against the employees?

    As for Leo’s actions, if he does something illegal then report him.

    There seems to be a morbid enjoyment by the people who are active with this site. Why the anger and insults?

    OK … Of my soapbox … Let the flames start as someine will surely say that I work for TWiT or that I am a sympathizer, which are both wrong. I do follow Ham Nation and a few other shows and that’s the extent of it.

      » Quote comment

    1. The employees are enablers. Why is it so difficult to understand that this website provides much needed shock therapy to Leo and his crew?

      For example, Megan sends a very bad message to her audience when she tolerates ongoing sexual harassment towards herself and even her daughter. She deserves to be harshly bashed until she learns to stand up for herself. Same goes for the rest of the employees who allow themselves to be walked on and diminished by Leo and his wife.

      Now go fuck a squirrel, nature boy.

        » Quote comment

        1. But victims can be enablers as well, they’re not mutually exclusive. You could argue that they can’t stop enabling because they’re being victimized, but still

            » Quote comment

    2. Foxbat said: OK, been following this for quite awhile and here are some comments:

      TwIT is a private company so they can destroy it or improve it as they wish. If they want to ignore people it’s their choice.

      If they make bad choices the company and their revenue will suffer … But it’s their company!

      If people don’t like the company then DON’T watch the shows or follow what they do. Seems like many here complain but still follow TWiT … which is funny.

      If people want to work there, then that’s their choice too. If they don’t like it there they can leave.

      People here have been insulting to employees yet no one here complains about that. You might dislike the owners but why take it against the employees?

      As for Leo’s actions, if he does something illegal then report him.

      There seems to be a morbid enjoyment by the people who are active with this site. Why the anger and insults?

      OK … Of my soapbox … Let the flames start as someine will surely say that I work for TWiT or that I am a sympathizer, which are both wrong. I do follow Ham Nation and a few other shows and that’s the extent of it.

      Woah I can’t believe I’m reading this shit. So by your analogy if I walk past a building and see someone raping women and children I shouldn’t do anything and keep walking because it’s a private business? Okay let’s consider a different scenario. I’m visiting a business and I see a male berating a woman for no fucking reason I should let that abuse continue because they are a private business? Well fuck you asshole. You’re just an enabler like Twit employees. How about this for an example. A genocidal maniac is killing million of jews and you in a different country knowing this is happening. Do you still fucking ignore it or do you send an army to stop that shit? These are extreme examples but don’t fucking tell me for one second I don’t have any right not to shine a light on the perverted behavior of that fat disgusting fuck because he legally registered his scam business. It’s morons like you that stop assholes like him from being accountable to society. I’m not talking about breaking laws, I’m talking about being a decent fucking person to others.

        » Quote comment

      1. You must know the definition of hyperbolic. You’re so good at it.

        If you want to make an argument for social responsibility, you’re not when you rave like a lunatic. You compare legal sexual innuendo jokes to raping and genocide. Leo lacks class and discretion. Address that if you want to be heard.

          » Quote comment

        1. Fauxjournalist said:
          You must know the definition of hyperbolic. You’re so good at it.

          If you want to make an argument for social responsibility, you’re not when you rave like a lunatic. You compare legal sexual innuendo jokes to raping and genocide. Leo lacks class and discretion. Address that if you want to be heard.

          You’re kidding yourself if you don’t think some Roger Ailes-type shit has been going on TWiT (and TechTV before it) since its inception.

            » Quote comment

          1. YES. A lot of women will never appear on Twit because Leo aggressively flirts with them with all sorts of bullshit. This was also going on at TechTV. He is a real masher and dog. It never ends.

              » Quote comment

        2. Fauxjournalist said:
          You must know the definition of hyperbolic. You’re so good at it.

          If you want to make an argument for social responsibility, you’re not when you rave like a lunatic. You compare legal sexual innuendo jokes to raping and genocide. Leo lacks class and discretion. Address that if you want to be heard.

          ACADEMIC RESPONSE (NON-RAVING-LUNATIC-VERION):

          I’m dumbfounded you can’t comprehend my simple point that staying out of people’s business is a dangerous precedent for society. Even though these acts are not “illegal” they impact how people are treated. We don’t want that behavior to go unchallenged. Leo lacks class and discretion at an astronomical level. Should he be ridiculed and constantly shamed for that? Absolutely. That’s what the blog is doing. If you don’t agree then you are simply enabling that behavior. I personal don’t think you are defending him but be a better person by not insulting others who are trying to discourage the horrible person that he is. If you followed Leo’s career you know he hasn’t tried to change his ways or simply apologize for being wrong. He’s tried to cover it up by lying and slandering others. That is inexcusable.

            » Quote comment

          1. I’m not defending Leo at all. There are valid things you can criticize and make jokes about. But I am absolutely attacking idiots on here that claim he’s doing things he clearly isn’t. And when those attacks display worse character traits than the person you’re attacking, you are responsible for killing this website. Stop foaming at the mouth long enough to look at how you’re being perceived. It’s easy for Leo to dismiss you with those you’re trying to educate about him. The worst here make it all too easy.

              » Quote comment

  7. Well that didn’t last long!!!
    Went to @leolaporte and just seen LaFatFuck’s latest tweet today
    Posted by yours truly the worlds worst lying piece of shit!!!!!
    Wow Leo you’ll do anything for attention!!!!!!
    Hope ManTranny aka CeHo gets aids from your oversized stink hole

    @LeoLaporte
    8/15/16, 9:59 AM
    TWiT Brick House Memories fb.me/4VR8nDsl3

      » Quote comment

      1. You know Joel, conservatives are far more likely to be ignorant morons, living in red states, married to their sisters after having dropped out of the fourth grade to work at WalMart.

        Perhaps we can keep politics out of our disgust for Leo antisocial behavior?

          » Quote comment

        1. macsimcon said:
          You know Joel, conservatives are far more likely to be ignorant morons, living in red states, married to their sisters after having dropped out of the fourth grade to work at WalMart.

          Perhaps we can keep politics out of our disgust for Leo antisocial behavior?

          I agree don’t bring up trump. I see how it is though. If I don’t agree with you I’m a hillbilly. Just like nazi germany. Hail Hitler!

            » Quote comment

  8. This article is on point. Good job.

    Many of the comments are batshit crazy. What in the absolute fuck is wrong with the worst of you? It’s like someone litters, so you defecate on it. You are driving people away from this site.

      » Quote comment

Leave a Reply to Soupslurper Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *