CEO SELLING T-SHIRTS

Sarah would look ok in blue one with three buttons open — Sarah would look decent in blue one with three buttons open and sleeves rolled up, I guess

In the future can the posts selling t-shirts be from someone besides the CEo. Surely she has more important things to do. Case in point: #Soupguzzler could not care less about the merchandise, it’s for a lackey, but it keeps the CEO occupied, I guess. We understand that you have some really pathetic fans but there is only so long you can milk a cow. How many shirts do the chat mods need? They barely leave the house as it is. I wish I was a CEo, seems fun, important decisions.

15 thoughts on “CEO SELLING T-SHIRTS”

I can’t understand why they keep having their Cult members pay for their uniform? Surely just being a Fan you should be sent something that Advertises TWiT for free. You are doing a service and spreading the brand name plus telling people that you really are a TWIT!

BHB» Quote comment

Do the shirts come with a big fat target on the back and a red “FIRED!” tag to be applied across the logo at a convenient time?

NormansThirdNipple» Quote comment

All these years, and I still don’t understand why anyone would pick that logo as a company logo.

tom» Quote comment

The Ghost of Ring Lardner says:

December 3, 2014 at 2:03 am

#Slop probably has that hideous logo tattooed on her backside.

The Ghost of Ring Lardner» Quote comment

Reply
HelloWorld says:

December 3, 2014 at 2:54 am

It looks like a weirdo freak ladybug or some other oddball insect thing. Certainly not approachable or cute or anything that invokes positivity. At least not to me. It’s just plain off-putting.

HelloWorld» Quote comment

Reply
Richie Rich says:

December 3, 2014 at 12:26 pm

It’s not like the name is any more inventive than the previous go. Leo likes to bitch that Twitter stole his name but what he doesn’t mention is how twit is a common British slang for an idiot.

Whether he thinks he’s the twit or the audience are the twits, it’s bad.

Richie Rich» Quote comment

Reply

Do frogs eat ladybugs?

NthMike» Quote comment

The TWiT branding was marketing suicide in itself. At this point, how could any fan be delusional enough to find pride in wearing that? Since the clueless, gold-digging, hideous skank took control, the whole network reeks of abuse, corruption, and disrespect for employees, and pure animosity for its loyal viewers.

I would like to see a TD post compiling some good alternatives to TWiT programs. I would miss Sarah, Paul, and Jason, but it’s becoming more difficult to tune in at all lately. Just looking at Leo makes me sick. Considering his history, I am enjoying his transformation into the ruthless, short-sighted, suit with his eye fixed on the bottom line and no regard for the quality of the content or the treatment of the human beings who make it all possible . The irony.

JD» Quote comment