Gynecological Breakthrough

The  World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology just ended with some interesting developments. The findings at this latest conference in Barcelona were not based on any TWiT programs and have upended the entire medical establishment. It appears that if a male gazes at a female with enough craving and unrestrained lust a woman can become impregnated.  Again we emphasize this was not based on any TWiT programs.

No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment
No Comment

39 thoughts on “Gynecological Breakthrough”

  1. Great Scott. Nooooooooo.

    Last week I couldn’t but gawk at Ms Kentzell in total disbelief at her performance on Inside TWiT. I promise you dear TotalDrama.org readers there was no craving or lust from me whatsoever; in fact it was just pity and gut wrenching sickness.

    Please tell me that there is no possibility that I may have unconsciously spawned with this harlot and promiscuous cow. I really don’t need a #gold-digger of her calibre and whopping experience pursuing me for alimony or for that matter my desirable body.

    What am I going to tell my wife and children?

      » Quote comment

    1. Perhaps few years ago when Leo still have 11 millions dollars in the bank would have told anyone there is no f*cking way that he could let that happened. Maybe the smartest thing he did was gave 1/2 of Twit to his ex-wife, Jennifer. Make no mistake the current Mrs Laporte wants 1/2 of his 1/2. She just needs to get rid of all of staff and push for the sale of Twit.

        » Quote comment

      1. The trouble with Leo’s claim about his ex-wife having 50% of the company is that there is other statements and claims that contradict his statements. In fact California has a simple rule, when people are married what belongs to one belongs to the other, I believe that the reason for the claim of 50% is because of two scenarios.

        For example he claims that he is the ‘sole proprietor’ and sadly he cannot be that if he ex-wife has 50% of the company, unless…

        1. It is an informal agreement. In which case she gets zero if the company collapses and has debts exceeding the worth of the remaining assets.

        2. It is (and I believe this is the case), a settlement as part of the divorce, again this will only be based on the net value of TWiT at the time of the divorce or the value of TWiT at the time of sale which ever value is the lower, of course, as assets are replaced and are not original to TWiT as it stood at the time of the divorce these assets cannot be included in the 50% because they were not ‘joint property’. Of course if TWiT fails and the assets do not cover the cost of debt then the ex-wife is, to put it bluntly, Shit Out Of Luck under California Divorce Law.

        I am sure that the reason that he pays in total the education of the children is not just because of moral obligation but because it was agreed in the settlement.

        In fact Leo has only made this 50% claim once, and only once. If she was a partner in the business then she would be liable for 50% of the total net profit as income, since the financials that he flings about never mentions her receiving 50% of the net income from the business it means that she is merely paid alimony from his income on a monthly or annual basis and is entitled to that alimony for the same number of years that they were married (unless she refuses alimony).

        Interestingly at the time that the divorce was being hammered out by attorney’s he threw tantrums live on TTG and he was calling her all the names under the sun.

        He was in a financial bind over the terms of the divorce and while TWiT continues he is still liable for that original 50% net value of TWiT as it stood (and agreed at the time of Divorce probably by an independent audit) unless…

        TWiT fails. He can file for bankruptcy. The ex-Wife gets a tiny fraction of the worth. The New Mrs Laporte, the gold digging Burger Flipper, purchases the assets at a discount price and TWiT resumes operating, possibly under a new name.

        This would tie in to all the talk that day on the Room Mic of names for TWiT.

        This is merely a quick analysis and not detailed like I would like but I don’t have time to hunt down court documents and records etc.

        This is merely my opinion so Leo, as you stalk the pages of Total Drama or have your Friar do it or maybe even Needles please remember that I am simply operating as a TWiT Pundit giving my opinion to these good folks at #Drama. I am sure they are delighted at receiving it and at least I am not trolling some innocent person on a Video Podcast all in the name of ratings!

          » Quote comment

        1. Oh and sorry if I went round in circles. I should work on it on a full screen editor and then put it into the comment section so that I can read it better and review the words.

          Night all.

            » Quote comment

        2. “TWiT fails. He can file for bankruptcy. The ex-Wife gets a tiny fraction of the worth. The New Mrs Laporte, the gold digging Burger Flipper, purchases the assets at a discount price and TWiT resumes operating, possibly under a new name.”

          OMG, so evil and yet so brilliant. Just don’t give Mrs Gold Digger any idea 🙂

            » Quote comment

        3. That makes sense, up to a point… it could be very possible that Leo is actively trying to kill off TWiT to relieve his financial obligation to his ex-wife, but make it look like it wasn’t done on purpose. However, by alienating many of the guests and prior hosts, I’m not sure how they could kill off the current TWiT, then operate under a new name, and then get anyone of any value to work for them going forward. That is, unless the “new TWiT” is a reincarnation of what TWiT used to be in the early cottage days, and he basically starts over from scratch.

            » Quote comment

          1. Well really it works as a big out from the building and allows him to downsize and blame other facts such as Trolls, the economy (blame the lack of advertisers). It would allow him to beg others for forgiveness and we all know the nature of people, they tend to forgive.

            In fact it would allow him in the short term to make that move to a home studio and move his office home purchased for peanuts by his CE’Ho’. It’s all he used before when he first started. It would probably require him to do more work.

            Even the dedicated line for TTG that is required could be installed at home. He knows that it is now possible to do a pretty decent show direct from home and using Google Hangouts. It has been demonstrated to him and I am sure his good friend Alex will teach him all the tricks and tips to doing Hangouts that he would need to operate his shows using that instead.

            He would be cutting costs. He knows that they still get the advertising and there are suckers out there that would send ‘donations’ to help subsidize his lifestyle.

              » Quote comment

        4. TWIT is a corporation (Laporte has told the story of filing for a S-Corp w/ one of TWiT’s sponsors many times) so Laporte’s ex-wife wouldn’t necessarily be entitled to 50% of the business in their divorce. Legally speaking, TWiT’s assets don’t belong to Leo (despite his claims to the contrary); they belong to TWiT.

            » Quote comment

  2. This is just a small compilation of Leo Laporte’s many many many abusive, disgusting and sexist comments towards women on TechTV and TWiT starting with Kate Bortello in 1999 all the way to Heather Hamann in 2014.

    Feel free to share, edit, re-edit, copy and ripoff anything you see in the video. It is free for all to use.

    The more people exposing this glutinous pig, the better.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiGHeSfD04g

    Enjoy and shame on you Gina Trapani for continuing to turn a blind eye to this.

      » Quote comment

    1. This is just called being responsible. Personally, I like to drink and I’m always forgetting my muff at home I end up somewhere I shouldn’t be, going through boxes like there’s no tomorrow but by the time I sober up I kinda regret I forgot my muff was at home the whole time. I can’t lose it…

        » Quote comment

  3. maybe its better to work backwards with what is now known: L&L are living together now but not when Soup first moved into the tiny apartment after the official split from Soup’s 2nd wife. That split might have been hurried along by Soup’s untimely revealing sext to Lisa the Lush(circa 2011). Some questions now arise, #1 was the Lush married when she started working for-on-over-on top of, Soup??? #2 Remember when daughter Abby’s Rode had a life changing event while back in college?, I believe it was tied to Soup and wife #2 marital problems. #3 Money grubbing Lush would have directed the two headed Soup Boner very early on to extract himself(his money) from Wife #2, so as to leave Lush more to spend on trips and $7,000 iMacs.

      » Quote comment

  4. I was unaware that #Soup was married twice before he hooked up with Mr. Ed. I always presumed the recent divorce was from his first and only wife.

      » Quote comment

    1. Soup has stated he kept( for Soup, all women are kept) a 1st wife, he was talking to a women( maybe HH) I don’t exactly remember whom, but a question was presented to Soup in such a way as to make the non disclosure of all wives very hard not to disclosue. I’ll bet if you go back thru Soups very scrubbed wiki page, something about #1 wife will be present somewhere. Soup has his own personal trolls keeping his wiki spick and span!!!

        » Quote comment

    1. Yes but it’s scrubbed, he has stated on The live feed their was a very early marriage in his life, I only heard it once. One has to assume Soups wiki page has only bio info Soup wants his minions to see. I believe his page has been locked before because a Soup troll would change a entry as per Soups order and just as quickly a truth detector would change the entry back to the truth. I’ll look thru the Soups wiki change history and see if it’s been mentioned at some point

        » Quote comment

      1. I actually think Soups admission a to a very early marriage was to HH when she first started call screening in the shit house. I think she asked Soup directly as to Jennifer being wife #1, and Soup, knowing HH has worked in SF radio for the past 20 years, and has contacts thru out the Bay Area that knows Soups history, couldn’t lie to her in such a direct manor on the live feed.

          » Quote comment

          1. Its been very infrequent that soup has admitted to the early hook up. I’m sure , based on soup’s wiki page, he doesn’t want his loyal twat minions to know much about his past… This blogspot posting has been out there for 10 years and is very telling, leosaffair.blogspot.com

              » Quote comment

  5. ok my bad I posted this before thinking it was the most current post, so what I was saying that that I think you should watch Security Now because at some point after the show Steve and Leo are talking about Sarah and Leo’s like “we’ve been friends for a long time and we never ruined it by entering into a relationship we both knew that” and so on and so forth. He is way into Sarah but it’s not as if she wanted a relationship and he didn’t, Leo is just full of himself.

      » Quote comment

    1. Professing his man crush on the live feeds all for his gold digger to listen to; this will not bode well for Sarah. Get ready to pack your bags, Sarah, before CEHo planning more seeds on Leo about how much Sarah’s shows costing him.

        » Quote comment

    1. Looks like Sarah is done and she knows it, she be on her knees under the desk just long enough to drum up a sexual harassment case. Probably not the first time she ate his clumpy soup and won’t be the last that’s probably why she can’t move her lips, lock jaw from getting scalled

        » Quote comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *